Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweet Baby Jesus (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Peter Hewitt (director). (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 10:38, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Sweet Baby Jesus (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable cancelled film. Future films are generally not notable until independent reliable sources confirm that principle photography has begun. This unsourced article stops just shy of claiming that filming did begin (saying it was scheduled to begin one month before it was cancelled). Sum mer PhD (talk) 00:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 25 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. No reason or sources are given as to why this cancelled film is somehow significant. 331dot (talk) 02:30, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as no evidence whatsoever of notability. →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  03:29, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect per - Since a paragraph's been added IMO redirecting is a much better solution.  →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  10:03, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete No citations or reasons that this should be notable. -- Jersey92 (talk) 04:34, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect Per User:MichaelQSchmidt -- Jersey92 (talk) 15:19, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:V.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 08:28, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Dead project or not, (did some research) this film topic has been the recipient of significant coverage.  Even if never made, the topic can be spoken of somewhere, and so I added a well-sourced short paragraph at Peter Hewitt (director) so we can serve our readers by sending them to the one place where topic may be spoken of in context, even without its own article. It might even be arguable that the failed production meets the caveats set by WP:NFF (paragraph 3).  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't know enough about how redirects are treated to comment on if one is valid in this case, but if the information can be made part of the director's article, that's OK by me. 331dot (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, redirects are cheap, serve our readers by sending them where sourcable content can best be placed, and the title is searchable. My thought and effort is based on WP:GNG and WP:NFF (paragraph 3) for a cancelled film project. Thanks for stopping back by.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Support redirect And strike-through previous comment.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 09:39, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - Redirects are cheap -- free even -- and a canceled project is a reasonable search term. Don't panic. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 18:02, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect per 's initiative consistent with WP:PRESERVE. --Arxiloxos (talk) 22:52, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.