Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweet Tea Queens (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Feel free to renominate SarahStierch (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Sweet Tea Queens
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't believe this meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for organisations. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:03, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 27 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak keep There have been two previous AfDs, the second AfD closed Delete but was overturned in DRV because the nom hadn't informed the original article creator, and new sources came to light. But subsequently no one added the sources into the article - I just did. I don't think this is a huge claim to notability but it's hard to vote Delete given what exists. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 21:19, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:06, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to Sweet Potato Queens. This group is a local chapter. Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * ..a local chapter with media coverage. The local chapter clause doesn't trump existing media coverage for that local chapter. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 17:55, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  essay  // 19:42, 13 November 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.