Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweetest Day


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was '''Keep. I don't like "Sweetest Day" either, though.''' DS 02:21, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Sweetest Day
Was prodded and removed. Possible hoax, seemingly not notable, is this something enyclopedic? Looks more like a back-door advertising gimmick Avi 16:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. A google seach returns over a half million results.  Many of these are reliable, albeit dedicated solely to romantic topics.  I once sent a Sweetest Day card.  It's a "Hallmark holiday" but in midwestern states it does bring in a lot of revenue in for flower, candy and card shops.  I'd say that makes it notable, if only for the economic benefits for certain industries.  It may also be notable for the controversy surrounding it.  I wouldn't oppose a merge into Hallmark holiday.  Srose   (talk)  16:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep lots of sources on this, it's apparently a minor holiday being pushed by various greeting card and candy companies. --Xyzzyplugh 16:21, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I added the hoax tag to the article because the Herbert Birch Kingston story of the origins of Sweetest Day is a hoax in my opinion. Primary source information from The Cleveland Plain Dealer Newspaper published October 8th, 1921 and October 8th, 1922 shows a very different beginning to the holiday. Here is a more factual account of how Sweetest Day began: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sweetest_Day&oldid=71758612 . (I realize that this version needs further editing/removal of caps/formatting) I do not believe the category of Sweetest Day should be deleted; it should just be reported for what it is: an 85-year-old hoax. Miracleimpulse 16:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not sure I agree with your hoax tag. There is a difference between "hoax" and "popular mythology".  The popular mythology of the day is that Kingston created it as day to honor orphans and shut-ins... and that version of events has been widely reported.  This should be in the article (see WP:V verifiability not truth).  If there is an alternate version of events that can be sourced (i.e. the Cleveland Plain Dealer Newspaper article, this could be included as well as an alternate, sourced, version of events.  The article space is big enough for both versions without making any judgements as to which is true.--Isotope23 16:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:V and yes... this is real. It's a "second Valentine's Day in the fall" celebrated in 4 midwestern states, and it is fairly prevalent there (as are the allegations that this is a "Hallmark Holiday").  Midwesterners are strange folk.--Isotope23 16:27, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Being from Illinois, I can tell you that Sweetest Day was never heard of before about 1989 when Hallmark began marketing Sweetest Day cards here. Miracleimpulse 16:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Sweetest Day is documented in, in (which describes it as "a ploy by the confection industry" as a reincarnation of Candy Day), and in  (which says that "Luckily, Sweetest Day has failed to attain the global stranglehold of the abhorrent Valentine's Day.").  The main problem with this page is an accuracy dispute.  Deletion is not the means for solving that.  Keep. Uncle G 17:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a (semi) real holiday, albeit only in the Midwest.  There are usually displays in Hallmark stores and radio ads for a week or two before Sweetest Day.  This is where I first heard of it. --Transfinite 17:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, having the article (esp. as it stands now) is not advertising for the candy and card industries. NawlinWiki 18:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've lived in 3 of the 4 states listed in the article, and I can attest to the fact that this is a real phenomenon (I hesitate to call it a "holiday," as it is a sick invention of the flower, candy and card industries--then again so are much of the practicies in the modern versions of Halloween, Valentine's Day and Christmas). It's a real fake holiday, so to speak. Rohirok 18:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is an advertising gimmick, but then so are all the other Hallmark holidays that have articles. --Dhartung | Talk 20:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I live in Wisconsin, and i have accually celebrated this day. It is an emerging holiday here in the mid-wast, that seems to be getting more and more popular by the year. I've even seen the Holiday mentioned on calenders distributed widely through the US. The accuracy of this article, however, is debatable.
 * Keep I work at the Vermont Teddy Bear Company for a couple of holidays a year. Sweetest Day, while not their largest holiday, is at least big enough to hire on extra part time help to the tune of about 50-100 extra bodies.  So it's known and has effects far outside just Wisconsin.  Dismas|(talk) 21:13, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It is a nauseatingly successful Hallmark holiday here in the Midwest, and eminently verifiable. --dtony 05:30, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Oh, it's a holiday is it? Is it religious? Nope. Is it official? Nope. Is it notable apart from that among a wide swatch of the population (Hallowe'en, Valentine's)???? Nope. NN.-Kmaguir1 06:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * It is demonstrably notable because it has been noted, by people independent of its creators (whomever one asserts them to be): 2 books and a journal article.  See above. Uncle G 08:02, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, show me some wiki guidelines on holidays which say that a non-religious, non-official, non-notable holiday, and I mean this strictly--not just what has been mentioned--should be included. I wouldn't even have problems including fictional holidays, like "Festivus", from Seinfeld which I'm sure is on wikipedia, because that's notable, but its notability stems from the fact it was on Seinfeld, not from the fact it's a real holiday. I take the position that holidays, real holidays, not just those invented, as this one is, by corporations and without involvement from the people, at a religious or state level, must include celebration or commemoration--I'm not sure how people celebrate or commemorate this. If it were fictional, it'd be notable as a joke. But as real, it's about as notable as "Win a Hawaiian getaway week". A few pop culture references do not a holiday make--they may make something else. But as long as it's an entry whose purpose is presenting a holiday, delete. If they want to call it other than a holiday, they can add it back.-Kmaguir1 08:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Official?? Is there a governing body that I'm not aware of that presides over holidays? Dismas|(talk) 08:29, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I take the position that holidays [...] must include celebration or commemoration &mdash; I'm not sure how people celebrate or commemorate this. &mdash; Then please read the article.  It actually tells you how this holiday is celebrated or commemorated. A few pop culture references [...] &mdash; There are no pop culture references in the article.  real holidays, not just those invented &mdash; Most of the holidays that you categorize as "real" were in fact invented.  Many religious holidays, which you accept, were invented, for examples.  They were just invented longer ago than 1921.  All secular holidays, such as Arbor Day and Labor Day, are invented.  Your espoused criterion that holidays must be "real" and not "invented" is an entirely faulty one.  Your actual criterion appears to be who the inventor of the holiday is.  You're happy to accept holidays invented by churches, legislatures, unions, and television programme scriptwriters, but not holidays invented by greetings cards and gift companies.  That's a highly subjective judgement, and not a particularly consistent one (given the inclusions of scriptwriters and unions).  Notability is not subjective.  It is a failure of our duty as encyclopaedists to exclude things from Wikipedia that we personally don't like, or think shouldn't exist.  As encyclopaedists, we should be looking at what the sources say.  The sources discuss this holiday. Uncle G 10:34, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable and verified. Batmanand | Talk 10:38, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Holiday is celebrated in Ohio.  My parents say it was created by Hallmark to sell more cards.  IS verifiable holiday.Trevor 15:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Reluctant keep. It isn't really "notable" or important, and I understand why many would just as soon not give it more publicity.  Still, it exists as fakelore and a marketing phenomenon.  - Smerdis of Tlön 16:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Listed in Chase's Calendar of Events, a standard reference work on holidays and observances. Gamaliel 23:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It exists and is advertised plenty, I always hear about it that time of year. Nate 01:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.