Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweetiee Weds NRI (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While the earlier article was rightly deleted as being premature, this article has a consensus for keep. The one dissenting !vote (other than the nom), appears to have been rebutted by another editor. (non-admin closure)  Onel 5969  TT me 21:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Sweetiee Weds NRI
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An earlier edition of this article was (rightly) deleted before the film was released, due to a lack of any real coverage. While the film has been released now - which is why my earlier CSD tag as recreated content was declined - I don't see anything in the sources provided or elsewhere much which established any real notability for this film. With the exception of an interview with one of the people involved, the only mentions I'm finding are entirely in passing, which argues against notability for the present. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   FITINDIA   08:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   FITINDIA   08:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Keep I think enough references been provided in the article to establish notability, They just needs to be re-coded accordingly. No use in deleting the article as the film has had wide release in India and in future the article will surely be revived again if deleted. 2405:204:C103:4903:3667:DEF2:7807:C57A (talk) 14:30, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * There's a difference between "existence" and "notability", though, which is the issue here. I'm not denying that the film has been released and widely, but in the absence of any coverage beyond "this film exists", it's not desperately encyclopedic. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If that was the case and we only kept films that were extremely popular then we can delete half of film pages on Wikipedia. Instead of deleting add tags for better references. The page is sure to prop up again in future.2405:204:C103:4903:714D:D3D4:1CC7:5749 (talk) 07:24, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I didn't say that only films which are "extremely popular" get articles, because that's patently not true. What I said was that films get articles if they are able to demonstrate significant, third-party coverage. Some films can do that before they're released, some films can do that shortly after they've been released, and some need to take longer than that. Some, of course, never get that level of coverage. If this film attracts that level of coverage later, there's nothing to stop the article being re-created then. Unless and until it does, I'd suggest we leave the WP:CRYSTALBALL alone. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:33, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- a promo page on an unremarkable film. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:51, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * How is the article a "promo page"? It does not have a promotional tone whatsoever, and is written quite neutrally. North America1000 17:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Jupitus Smart  10:27, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * keep per sourcing showing WP:NF is met. Concerns toward format can be corrected through regular editing. Deletion does not serve Wikiepedia.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 02:34, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * IE: Found a full review in Times of India.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 02:37, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: There is enough coverage to meet WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 18:51, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.