Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swiftfox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep Sufficient reliable sources are included in the article. However, a point to people working on this article: forum posts are not reliable sources and should be replaced with reliable sources or the information removed if it cannot be reliably sourced. JoshuaZ 23:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Swiftfox

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability separate from that of Firefox. Unlike (for example) Flock there has been no coverage by independent sources. Wikipedia isn't here to be a list of every custom build of Firefox. Cynical 10:44, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Zouavman   Le   Zouave   12:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are good references within the article. I would come to Wiki to look up neutral information on just such a topic if I came upon it while reading. At worse, merge with Mozilla Firefox. And if it survives rename Mozilla Swiftfox. SilkTork 14:49, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. We can't call the article 'Mozilla Swiftfox' as it is not a Mozilla product. The reason it's called SwiftFox in the first place (instead of just Firefox) is precisely because of the trademark issues surrounding Mozilla and its products. Cynical 17:19, 15 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep based on linux.com and apcstart.com articles in the page Corpx 04:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It has numerous links outside of wikipedia. Softpedia, linux.com, and APC magazine to name a few. It was also one of the first builds to be optimized to a specific processor. While I think it needs to be updated, it should stay. Kilz 21:15, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep though the article really needs to be cleaned up and a more information added. 86.3.84.147 13:09, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - it's a notable enough variation on Firefox; I've seen it mentioned in multiple places and I have even used it once or twice... --Itub 08:37, 16 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.