Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swiki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 01:25, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Swiki

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wiki software. No independent sources, no evidence of innovation, significance or market share. Guy (Help!) 16:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment It certainly seems to pass the google test. Whether or not there are any reliable sources in there, I have no idea. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 17:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I've found immediately available coverage at Information Today and at Linux.com. Google Scholar also returns a good number of related results, though I can only access the abstracts of some at the moment. I'll try to hunt down the full articles through my school's library when I have more time. A couple that I found include XPSwiki: An Agile Tool Supporting the Planning Game (From the book Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering), SuperSwiki - bringing collaboration to the class room (From proceedings from the first conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating Through Computing), CoWeb–Experiences with Collaborative Web Spaces (From the book Usenet to CoWebs: Interacting with Social Information Spaces) and SWiki: A Semantic Wiki Wiki Web (A master's thesis from the University of Southampton). Someone else can try to integrate these, or I can do it later, or a little of both. LaMenta3 19:39, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per LaMenta3. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 20:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep -- clearly notable; here are 2 more refs:
 * I found these with a 30-second Google News Archive search -- A. B. (talk) 04:59, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I found these with a 30-second Google News Archive search -- A. B. (talk) 04:59, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I found these with a 30-second Google News Archive search -- A. B. (talk) 04:59, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.