Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swimming Pool Deck Tile Layout


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ff m  01:26, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Swimming Pool Deck Tile Layout

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Per WP:NOTHOWTO - Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia not a DIY manual. nancy (talk) 15:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * delete That may well be the dullest article on wikipedia. I know dullness isn't a criteria for deletion, but it had to be said. Actual justification per nom. MadScot (talk) 15:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * delete How-to thinly disguised as an encyclopedia article. DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:37, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * delete as WP:NOTHOWTO, a "how-to" style manual of instructions. -- Badgernet    Talk  15:38, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as something of an instruction manual (though rather lacking at that). Either way this isn't WikiHow. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete cool, en has got a not-howto rule? Not significant for an encyclopedia.  abf  /talk to me/  19:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete this how-to guide. Cliff smith  talk  20:43, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: this how-to won't even survive WikiHow! Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 03:30, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Its a shame this needs to be here another 3-4 days longer.  JBsupreme (talk) 07:01, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a diagram in a boring 1980's math book, or the DIY Network.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 07:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:SNOW. There can be no more classic case of a DIY manual within the wikisphere.  Ohconfucius (talk) 09:29, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Sure the article is dull, but its information and quite useful. So how to make it not a how-to page to make it more ‘’encyclopaedic’’ would be helpful. To quote "Works of encyclopedic scope aim to convey the important accumulated knowledge for their subject domain". I think this ticks the box despite the limited scope of the article. Andrewray99 (talk) 08:06, 26 September 2008 (UTC) (moved from AFD talk page nancy (talk) 08:23, 26 September 2008 (UTC))


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.