Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swimming pool cover


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Swimming pool. Liz Read! Talk! 00:56, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Swimming pool cover

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG. The only sources that came up on Google were pool cover company websites and advert-laden listicles. NW1223&lt;Howl at me&bull;My hunts&gt; 01:07, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Subject doesn't meet the GNG, and WP:NOTDICTIONARY also seems to apply here. User:Let'srun 01:47, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  01:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to  may be a valid alternative to deletion here. Apparently this was split from, but perhaps given the thin sourcing, the subsequent shrinking of the section was, by itself, the actual correct solution to the size/length problem, not a separate article.  WC  Quidditch  ☎   ✎  02:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I like the idea of redirecting the article. Cwater1 (talk) 02:38, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I would not be opposed to that either. NW1223&lt;Howl at me&bull;My hunts&gt; 18:41, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Swimming_pool. Mooonswimmer 13:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.