Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swing Unlimited (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Swing Unlimited
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable Vmavanti (talk) 03:28, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Just a self-funded jazz band playing old hits at local venues on the south coast of England. What they do is admirable, but nowhere near notable enough for an encyclopedia. Even the one reference in the article has been badly archived and makes no mention of the band, so there are no independent sources whatsoever. Richard3120 (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: I gave a delete view in the 2010 AfD which closed without consensus (though with no arguments towards retention). Looking for sources again, I still see nothing better than passing local coverage too insubstantial for the WP:NORG criteria (former or current) for an article in its own right. A brief mention in Bournemouth might be an option, but the sources feel too light to sustain that alternative. AllyD (talk) 10:46, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment It appears to be of local interest only, perhaps unlike Loose Tubes, which the article compares it to. Vmavanti (talk) 19:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * yes, Loose Tubes did actually garner some significant national media attention at the time, unlike this band. Richard3120 (talk) 19:35, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Vmavanti (talk) 01:04, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. There is not a single sold RS to support notability on this band. The single reference in the article is junk (including archive reference) and makes no reference to the band anymore.  This is a non-notable local bank.  Definately not even close to being notable for Wikipedia. Britishfinance (talk) 00:50, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Wait...it's a bank? But a very entertaining bank.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.