Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SwissWatchExpo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:46, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

SwissWatchExpo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

None of the references meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability, the references are puff profiles which rely on interviews with the founder and/or company announcements. No "Independent Content" as per WP:ORGIND. In addition and not unconnected, article creator has been indef blocked for advertising/promotion.  HighKing++ 15:18, 25 July 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:46, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Georgia (U.S. state).  HighKing++ 15:19, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional article. Sources used are a bit of a stretch ("where to buy the best watches" and the like.) The Spanish GQ article seems iffy as well. Oaktree b (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete, Promotional article, fails notability. Alex-h (talk) 15:54, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I didn't find any sources that would make me believe it should pass any notability guideline. Jacona (talk) 21:35, 3 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.