Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swiss Holiday Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:26, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Swiss Holiday Park

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article is about a resort in Switzerland with a hotel (125 rooms), 85 holiday apartments and four restaurants. The company was founded in 1996, employs 260 people and has revenues of about 24 Million Swiss Francs (2019), that's 27 Mio. USD. So what? Lack of notability, non-descript architecture. This article was paid for by the company itself ([Special:Contributions/Baba-yaga-cat sock puppet]), and just deleted on the German language Wikipedia by me. Wikipedia is no web space for advertising. But maybe rules are different here, so please decide. Minderbinder (talk) 14:06, 27 August 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 15:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Amusement parks-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment Well, coverage is all in German, was hoping for some French... I can't tell, it looks routine (they named a new director), Swiss-German sources are not in my notability wheelhouse. Oaktree b (talk) 19:27, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find anything we can use. Oaktree b (talk) 23:53, 4 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.