Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swiss Made Software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete with no prejudice against an article on the topic when we have multiple, independentreliable sources about the topic. JoshuaZ 20:32, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Swiss Made Software

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This appears to be a non-notable movement. The Evil Spartan 19:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertising, lack of reliable independent sources; possibly brief mention at Swiss Made. Sandstein 19:53, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletions.   -- Sandstein 20:05, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete advertisement. Jakew 21:59, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

please reconsider carefully. Haldimann 14:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as you can see at the swissmadesoftware.org homepage, the "swiss made software" label has already been adopted by 15 Swiss software companies. The usage of the label is open and free for any Swiss software company. The entry is not for advertisement but simply to unify the "swiss made" label in the software sector.
 * The problem here has much less to do with it being an advertisement, than with these problems: a) notability, and b) verifiability. Can you provide any third party reliable sources for the claim that 15 major software companies are using the tag? The Evil Spartan 17:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Swiss Made Software revived
A year ago, I have put this page online. The label has now been adopted by 70 companies. "swiss made software" has become a notable movement and label for good software, made in Switzerland. Please google "swiss made software" for references.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * ''Thank you for your response. I can understand your point and will provide proof in a couple of weeks. --Haldimann 07:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)