Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swiss vacation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete - this is a clear case for CSD G11. Nihiltres ( t .l ) 16:15, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Swiss vacation

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Largely original research with no references, I'm not convinced this can be made into a viable article. Marasmusine 11:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment What were you thinking. you should have speedied it-- Phoenix 15 13:36, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Under what criteria? Marasmusine 14:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Deor 13:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Nonsense, unencyclopediodic, copies material from other articles, Weasel words, peackock terms, NPOV, Inaccurate, no references, non-notable, spam, fails to establish context, not a travel guide, badly written etc.-- Phoenix 15 13:36, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I forgot to mention Original research-- Phoenix 15 13:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per Deor sirmob 14:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Just send me a postcard I agree, this is a speedy delete. Mandsford 15:01, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.