Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Switch adapted toys


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen (talk) 02:24, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Switch adapted toys

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Concept which does not seem to be in widespread use, or at least there is not independent recognition of it. Few relevant Google hits. Article seems to primarily promote two companies that make such products. (Contested speedy and PROD.) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment While I agree that this was likely created for promotion and google news just gave a few meager reports, google scholar had one or two papers dealing directly with the subject matter under the same name. There were also a few mentions in google books, but they appeared brief. But I tagged this for rescue as it may be up to notability standards based on academic sources. Siawase (talk) 14:27, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Click the Google news link at the top of the AFD. The first one is from San Diego Union - Tribune - Mar 4, 2005, and covers this topic quite well.  The article should be expanded, but no reason to delete a notable topic.   D r e a m Focus  02:09, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Hard to verify, as article is behind a pay wall. Only six Google news hits total, not much there. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 09:20, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep gnews didn't convince me but gbooks has enough coverage. LibStar (talk) 03:52, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.