Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SwitzerLAN


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Although I see some Swiss media coverage of the 2015 event, the article is entirely promotional in nature and would need a rewrite from scratch and submission to WP:AFC.  Sandstein  05:33, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

SwitzerLAN

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No outside, reliable sources, other than their website. The only relevant article was from 2015. Fails WP:NEVENT. --   LuK3      (Talk)   22:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Subject lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 23:10, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Don't delete this article. The article include website from outside, which got more details. In this article, there are just facts about the event and of course some informations about the last event and tournament ranking list. If something is wrong, then please let me know in a privat conversation. OnlyOneCookie (talk) 11:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete—no evidence of third party coverage to establish notability. And even if there was, this reads like an advertisement, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten.  The Blue Canoe  23:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - This article is an advertisement. --Novarupta (talk) 13:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 22:38, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 22:38, 12 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - No evidence in meeting the WP:GNG, and if it did, it reads so much like an advertisement that a WP:TNT would probably be in store... Sergecross73   msg me  16:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete no indication of meeting the requirements of the general notability guideline. &mdash; Music1201  talk  03:12, 15 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.