Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swizzz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:36, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Swizzz

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable rapper. Sole reference is self published (Label/production company). Google searches find no reliable, third party sources to establish notability. Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 18:59, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 23 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, borderline speedy a7, fails WP:MUSIC and WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  05:34, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per NawlinWiki and WP:Notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iglooflame (talk • contribs) 06:48, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Weak delete Close association with Hopsin (clearly notable), apparently lots of fan interest, and 2 albums on Hopsin's label Funk Volume which looks like it's getting close to just about satisfying WP:MUSIC 5, but no reliable sources yet to indicate why SwizZz himself is notable in his own right. Delete, for now, but a likely candidate for an article in the future. ✤ Fosse 8 ✤ talk 09:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.