Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sword and crown (module)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Dungeons & Dragons modules. Stifle (talk) 10:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Sword and crown (module)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article topics should be notable. However, it appears that Sword and crown as a module has not received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Suntag (talk) 06:57, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * delete can find no evidence of independent notability. Brilliantine (talk) 07:00, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete an article starting with the product number looks a lot like WP:ADVERT. Richard Pinch (talk) 07:39, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  13:56, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No assertion of notability. No references other than the ISBN of the product. Possible copyvio for ripping the back cover. ~ Ningauble (talk) 14:44, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and/or redirect to Birthright (campaign setting), or perhaps better yet List of Dungeons & Dragons modules. BOZ (talk) 14:48, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to List of Dungeons & Dragons modules per BOZ. I disagree with Richard Pinch that this is an advert since it refers to a product no longer in print from a publisher that no longer exists.  I feel deletion without redirect would be overly strong because I'd heard of this product in the past, and I'd expect to find at least some reference to it on Wikipedia.-- S Marshall   Talk / Cont  15:32, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to [[List of Dungeons & Dragons modules. The article could be expanded if someone wanted to do the research to find secondary sources, but there really is nothing significant about this particuliar module (that I recall) to warrent a seperate article at this time. Turlo Lomon (talk) 15:42, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge, edit/trim and redirect to List of Dungeons & Dragons modules as per BOZ. Web Warlock (talk) 15:52, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability, and very little content worth saving. Percy Snoodle (talk) 08:24, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to List of Dungeons & Dragons modules as per BOZ. Edward321 (talk) 20:37, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.