Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swords of the Ancients


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete all articles. Mailer Diablo 21:24, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Swords of the Ancients
Advertising spam TexasAndroid 19:35, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Also Cinthorc, Luciendar, Mithrodin. and Valermos, specific sword in the collection. All spam, IMHO. - TexasAndroid 19:38, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Delete them all, adverts. --Ton e 21:39, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

''This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!'' Mailer Diablo 09:11, 20 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete all as advertisments. NoIdeaNick 10:27, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Concur on delete -- this reads as an advert, no more. Formally, I dispute notability. -- Simon Cursitor 14:23, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Delete, no assertion of notability Non-notable, no verification of "collector's item" assertion. Run them all through and bury these articles under forgotten barrows.  RGTraynor 15:45, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge with Kit Rae. Cleanup is also required. Sorry, RGTratnor, but speedy delete is *WRONG*, and I personally think his vote (and others?) should be discounted. Please read Criteria for speedy deletion. Kit Rae is notable enough. McKay 23:28, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Hm, I suppose that the author calling the swords "collector's items" is an assertion of notability, however much it's an unsourced, unverified ad claim, so that takes A7 off the table. I've changed my vote to just plain Delete.  What's your basis for voting to keep, while we're questioning one another's votes?  RGTraynor 14:45, 21 April 2006 (UTC)


 * delete blatant advertising Pete.Hurd 23:52, 22 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.