Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syclo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Syclo

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article is a recreation of a page name of a previously  Speedy  Deleted under A7, and appears to  be a vehicle for promoting  the company's product(s) or service(s). Kudpung (talk) 00:10, 13 October 2010 (UTC) jgranda what would you differently because they are one of the top two enterprise mobile software providers and it looks like most corporate listings. It doesn't do any blatant advertising of events, etc but rather gives a background. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.21.44.66 (talk) 15:59, 19 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:35, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  —Kudpung (talk) 01:09, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete The sources are mostly crap, (one requires payment to see, and the PDF is poorly encoded and crashes Firefox when I try to load it.) and I don't see notability on news or general searches. Sven Manguard  Talk  00:41, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources have been added to show credibility. Due to the relative newness of its field, you won't find a overwhelming number of general news sources to draw from here, admittedly - but more importantly this is a recognized leader in mobile enterprise applications, a large (and growing) technology category deserving of increased public awareness. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nholman7 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - The Chicago Tribune ref seems reasonable (go to page 2 of the article to actually see Syclo mentioned). The other refs seem tenuous, but others may be found.  Article seems tolerably encyclopedic and non-commercial.  I encourage interested editors to keep working on this article, and especially to find a few more good refs.  Ebikeguy (talk) 05:19, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.