Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 10:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Sydle

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

"Best Companies" lists in Brazil and a series of press releases are the only available references. Fails WP:NCORP. Prior contested G11. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 08:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software,  and Brazil.  Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 08:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, their LinkedIn page says they have under 200 employees, so not a large company. More telling, I tried searching for Sydle+Zamagna (company name + CEO/founder name), and came up with close to nothing. Lacks significant coverage. -- Mvqr (talk) 11:04, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. If the company was listed as one of the best in the country, there is notoriety. The fact that the sources are only in the references and not included in the article, by itself, is not a valid reason for deletion. In this regard, I quote the policy WP:PRESERVE: "Wikipedia is a work in progress and perfection is not required. As long as any of the facts or ideas added to an article would belong in the "finished" article, they should be retained if they meet the three core content policies: Neutral point of view (which does not mean no point of view), Verifiability, and No original research." ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 13:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Being recognized as one of the top 20 best company to work for in Brazil for the last 6 years by the Great Place to Work Institute is not an indication of notability in any way, and in fact being in those types of lists is specifically listed as an example of trivial coverage. As part of Editing policy, WP:PRESERVE is about retaining content within an article, not about the article itself being deleted. Lack of notability isn't something that editing can fix. - Aoidh (talk) 11:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.