Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney Eatz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 22:19, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Sydney Eatz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article. Not seeing enough in the article or through searching the Internet to pass WP:GNG. Promotional article created by a SPA. Edwardx (talk) 11:29, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WeAreAll Here  talk  11:33, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women -related deletion discussions. WeAreAll Here  <sub style="color:blue">talk  11:33, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada -related deletion discussions. <b style="color:red">We</b><b style="color:orange">Are</b><b style="color:blue">All</b> Here  <sub style="color:blue">talk  11:33, 14 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete "Promotional" is understating things -- and the subject it's promoting is non-notable in the extreme. --Calton | Talk 14:16, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete there are numerous reliable sources, but they are all basically the same news report rehashed, and all appear to have been published within a two-day span. So BLP1E and WP:NOTNEWS. 104.163.140.141 (talk) 22:16, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing here is an "inherent" notability claim that guarantees her an article just for existing, but a small two-day blip of purely local media coverage in this context just makes her a WP:BLP1E, not a topic who's passed the ten-year test for enduring significance yet. I live in Toronto and had already seen some of these exact sources before I had any knowledge that this article was starting to happen — but none of them made me think she needed an encyclopedia article for it, because I know how to discern the difference between coverage that actually supports notability and coverage that just flunks the WP:NOTNEWS test. Bearcat (talk) 03:26, 15 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.