Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney New Year's Eve 2011–12


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Sydney New Year's Eve. Deletion of the 2008-2009 article is unanimously endorsed at DRV, and the consensus here is that the others are all relevantly similar. The earlier years were created as redirects, so for consistency and preservation of links I will recreate these as redirects after deletion. RL0919 (talk) 16:37, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Sydney New Year's Eve 2011–12

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per Articles for deletion/Sydney New Year's Eve 2008–09 individual instances of this event are not notable. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * This nomination also covers all other existing articles in Category:Sydney New Year's Eve shows.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  ViperSnake151   Talk  16:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  ViperSnake151   Talk  16:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment - it's improper to nominate a whole bunch of articles in order to go and do particular searches for each one to see whether there was widespread coverage or not. They should be assessed individually. Bookscale (talk) 03:39, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - I've also sought a deletion review of the original article as it was far from clear there was consensus. The arguments for deletion consisted of editors saying they didn't think the article was "worthwhile", which is not a valid argument for deletion. Bookscale (talk) 03:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Already all summarized in Sydney New Year's Eve in better prose, and unsourced playlists and 'type what I see' rundowns of television broadcasts. Not commenting on the above; my vote! and comments in the 2008-09 nom are 100% based on policy and will withstand proper scrutiny in a deletion review.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:09, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - that isn't true, the claim of "100% policy" is not correct. Bookscale (talk) 05:29, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete (or replace by redirect). The level of detail in these articles (e.g. "Before Ten went to a commercial break, a recording was done of some of the events that happened in 2007. After the break, Kim Watkins interviewed a man named Richard Watson, a trends forecaster.") is excessive. The head article is sufficient. DexDor(talk) 07:05, 8 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete all- Although Sydney New Year's Eve is a notable and worthwhile topic, it dosn't follow that individual editions are. The individual years are already covered in appropriate depth at the main article. These ones are all really really banal trivia, and would only be distracting clutter if merged. Reyk YO! 06:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete All This all seems like a giant broadcast or tv guide or playlist, it is difficult to imagine just who would think it'd be a good idea to have articles on individual new years' celebrations. Even when something noteworthy happens at one, like Mariah Carey bombing at Dick Clark's New Year's Rockin' Eve a few years ago, it is a 2-3 sentence blurb on the main article, not an article on the entire night itself.  The "people hail 2011's New Years' Eve celebration a success!" citation is just routine news of the next day.ValarianB (talk) 18:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as per conclusion that the individual annual events are not notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete all - unless anyone can point out why one in particular has enduring notability. How did these survive so long? Nfitz (talk) 00:34, 13 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.