Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney Scotia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Sydney Scotia

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:TOOSOON. No major independent coverage or notable roles. Bettydaisies (talk) 23:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 15.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 00:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:17, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. The subject does not meet Notability. My searches for sources found only interviews in sources that were likely unreliable, passing mentions, and unreliable sources. Cunard (talk) 08:20, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Cunard. GoldenHayato (talk) 11:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of coverage in independent, reliable sources.  PK  T (alk)  13:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete for now, obviously without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when she has better sources. It is really difficult to say this about someone just three days after binge-watching the entire ten-episode season of her new series, but "I know who she is" isn't enough: most of her castmates don't have articles yet either, and I've searched for better sources and came up dry. Literally the strongest source I found was a 50-word blurb, which ain't enough, and the references present in the article as written are entirely primary sources that aren't support for notability at all. Bearcat (talk) 06:20, 19 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.