Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney Secondary College (Blackwattle Bay Campus)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn. The only other non-keep voter (myself) is also fine with a withdrawal. Jenks24 (talk) 06:30, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Sydney Secondary College (Blackwattle Bay Campus)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Fails to meet WP:CORPDEPTH of WP:ORG. Lack of coverage by independent reliable organisations and outlets.  James ( Talk •  Contribs ) • 9:42pm • 11:42, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 22 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Agree with the nom, but I'd suggest a redirect to Sydney Secondary College would be a better outcome that deletion. Jenks24 (talk) 08:56, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * That would be a better idea.  James ( Talk •  Contribs ) • 9:58am • 23:58, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per thinking elucidated at Notability (high schools). WWGB (talk) 00:19, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Why should poorly-written articles with limited coverage be retained? What you have cited is an essay.  James ( Talk •  Contribs ) • 11:19am • 01:19, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I found 16 references with very little effort. As with other articles about high schools, I think this article will survive AfD. WWGB (talk) 02:39, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep it's actually an existing high school. and high schools are inherently notable. LibStar (talk) 03:31, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I did a standard Google search which returned very little in the way of reliable sources, I hadn't used their News search. Given the improved nature of the article is it possible to withdraw the request?  James ( Talk •  Contribs ) • 4:02pm • 06:02, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per Notability (high schools). 'Poorly written' is absolutely, not  a criterion  for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:45, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - plenty of sources available from which it can be expanded to comfortably meet WP:ORG. TerriersFan (talk) 02:49, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.