Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney Smith's salad dressing (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:46, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Sydney Smith's salad dressing (2nd nomination)
Last AfD resulted in no consensus (only four comments). Recipe in verse has now been sent to the cookbook. TheProject 03:21, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not an instruction manual ... good grief ... BigDT 03:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete with prejudice per above Hobbeslover | (talk) (contribs) 03:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. There is a reason the WikiMedia folks run more than one Wiki... -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 03:46, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per BigDT. Bejnar 04:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I think it's kind of a cute recipe,but since it has already been sent to Wiki cookbook... Bwithh 05:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a cookbook. J I P  | Talk 09:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is policy that Wikipedia is not a cookbook. Vizjim 11:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a cookbook. --Ter e nce Ong 13:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I could sorta see this being a keepable article if a lot more context of its use and history were added, but it's had its chance. Grand  master  ka  01:04, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and turn this into the starter of a more general article on the once important phenomenon of "Rhyming recipes" (see, e.g., and  -- look under DOUGHNUTS). The recipe by itself, isolated from the context, is insignificant (although not bad). --Lambiam Talk  15:17, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * For a preview what such an article might look like, I invite you to have a peep at User:Lambiam/Rhyming recipes. --Lambiam Talk 17:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.