Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Ashik Rahman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:56, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Syed Ashik Rahman

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Other than one interview and some passing mentions, there is no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Didn't won any significant award or anything. Fails WP:GNG, WP:DIRECTOR, WP:ANYBIO. (Also, i think the article creator has connection with the subject, see this photo, took by article creator) আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 22:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete The cited sources are: a primary source interview with no independent analysis, brief quotes of him, one-line producer credits, and a press release about a non-notable business award from a non-notable organization ("a network of more than 16,000 top marketing executives"). Searches of the usual Google types, in English and Bengali, found nothing more substantial. Without significant coverage in indpendent reliable sources, does not meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:12, 10 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.