Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Mehmood Shah Bukhari


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Syed Mehmood Shah Bukhari

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not notable scholar - external links/references do not support notability ukexpat (talk) 22:50, 25 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. References in article fail WP:RS. No clear indication of notability from present state of article.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:13, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. The listed references are not reliable. Actually they are lousy sites and fanpages created by the author of this article. The same spammy references are listed on the other articles he creates, mainly for religious propaganda. -- Itemirus  Message me!  05:27, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - The reference -- "" -- is a good reference for the Syed Mehmood Shah Bukhari article. Per that reliable source, people normally call him Zinda Pir. There is a Pir Khidir Zinda shrine, but there also is other source material on Zinda Pir (birth name:Syed Mehmood Shah Bukhari). -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 18:12, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * A Google search excluding pages from Facebook, Wikipedia and Youtube scantly yields 21 results; none of these can be considered a reliable source, except the article you've linked to. Yet the article is more about the architecture of the village; the quack is barely mentioned because some deluded guy pays him visit once in a while, when he'd better educate himself observing the surrounding buildings or help the miserable residents get rid of the large chunks of uncovered garbage dumps and ponds of filthy water bordering them.-- Itemirus  Message me!  22:10, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 27 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as per the nomination.--Juristicweb (talk) 00:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.