Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Muhammad Ammar Kazmi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 18:51, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Syed Muhammad Ammar Kazmi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not an elected MP. fails both GNG and Wikipedia:NPOLITICIAN. Saqib (talk) 00:35, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning)  talk  01:24, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:53, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 16:02, 3 August 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I'll relist again, and request that editors provide justifications with their !votes
 * delete nonnotable politician. Staszek Lem (talk) 17:03, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 09:23, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NPOL as he's never held elected office. He stood in an election, but wasn't elected and just being a candidate isn't enough to justify an article. No indication he passes WP:GNG by being notable for any other reason - searches using his name as per the article and the slightly different spelling used in the reference don't find anything of value in this respect. Neiltonks (talk) 10:27, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-winning election candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates — if they didn't win the election and thereby hold the seat, then they need to be demonstrated as notable for some other reason besides the fact of having their name on a ballot, such as passing the notability standards for their prior career before they ran as candidates. But there's no such claim being made here at all. Bearcat (talk) 15:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete unelected candidates are not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-winning election candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:13, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:NPOL; candidates for office are not inherently notable. PohranicniStraze (talk) 02:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete – Any non-winning election candidate who hasn't held office is not notable. There are no other sources displaying notability so this article outright fails all notability guidelines. The article has grammatical errors that I can't understand, it is poorly written and it is a stub with no information useful to anyone. Delete. Redditaddict69 16:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.