Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Muhammad Kaswar Gardezi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep--Ymblanter (talk) 06:39, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Syed Muhammad Kaswar Gardezi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article has no references backing up any statement within it. Although not a living person, article material should be verifiable from reliable sources. Most of the material in this article has been provided from three accounts which from the account names appear to be relatives of the article subject (an one is specifically named in the article as the father. 86.149.141.166 (talk) 11:29, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep, seems to be notable - a few mentions, although brief, in books; only one news mention I could find describes him as "noted political leader and intellectual" (22nd anniversary of Syed Qaswar Gardezi on 11th, Balochistan Times, 10 September 2015) - the lack of news coverage could be because he died in 1993 and most news from then wouldn't be available online. Some of the external links appear to be references although they need checking for reliability and converting to inline references if applicable. Peter James (talk) 21:34, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:17, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:17, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Good coverage in reliable sources for this pre-internet person. AusLondonder (talk) 08:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  02:34, 2 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.