Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Sameer Munna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  qedk ( t  愛  c ) 06:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Syed Sameer Munna

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

paid for PR spam sourced entirely to black hat SEO fake sites and press releases/pay for publication. Praxidicae (talk) 15:04, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:45, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:45, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:46, 13 May 2020 (UTC)


 * There is reference from The Hans India offcial website which means nobody can buy it from them & any pr spam or black hat seo - none of references are fake sites Thank you  Sandwicked (T) 16:46, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Wrong, The Hans frequently will post paid for publications without actually identifying it. Praxidicae (talk) 17:39, 13 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete the sources are obviously paid promotional junk. The page therefore lacks independent reliable sources to establish notability. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 17:47, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete spam. Mccapra (talk) 18:45, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - The subject of the article does not pass GNG or NARTIST criteria. Netherzone (talk) 02:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - I do not think that the article is okay as per WP:GNG - also, random google search comes up with few sources, which are less neutral and more puffery. This puffery is highly self-published or paid. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 06:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Guys i also researched as well without researching how can i write the article  maybe if its not notability den fine atlest don't defame the person by saying paid pr or fake websites, i would say please someone once review the article again & end the discusses here Thank you i did not mean to disrespect any of you guys Thank you so much :D  Sandwicked (T)  —Preceding undated comment added 08:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete clear GNG failure Spiderone  10:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete this is WP:SNOWballing. Can an admin come in and close this now? Pinging the closers of the last five discussions in this deletion sort --Theredproject (talk) 13:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Reading through biography does not show anything to pass notability. Nika2020 (talk) 15:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - As spam. Entirely fails any notability criteria you may care to list. --Jack Frost (talk) 11:27, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:52, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - even assuming it's not spam, the sourcing is terrible and fails general notability. Bearian (talk) 03:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.