Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylfronia King


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. G11, entirely promotional with no likelihood of improvement. The limit for what counts as promotional in pop music is a little more relaxed than in some fields, but this is beyond the limit.  DGG ( talk ) 03:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Sylfronia King

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unconvinced that this person passes WP:MUSIC. Lots of hits, but almost all to self-published or primary sources. Black Kite (talk) 18:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - A major reference for this article is footnoted as " young, robert (1 june 2012). "career success". Retrieved 1 june 2012." It links to Reug Vision, a company affiliated with the subject of the article.  The remaining references establish only that the singles exist, that King appeared at an event, and that she has a film credit.  (One is a dead link.) Non-notable.JSFarman (talk) 23:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Promotional article about a non-notable singer. Speaking of promotion, the article's creator has been indefinitely blocked for promotion.  Erpert  WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 05:51, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Snow delete per WP:BLP &mdash; Article is very "chatty" and reads more like a résumé than a biography. Content such as "Associated acts: Wendy Williams, Oprah Winfrey, Ricki Lake" exemplifies the issue (how can Oprah, for example, be a related act to a musician?). References are hardly reliable and only identify the existence of singles, not their notability or chart performance. And while itself not necessitating deletion, English (specifically grammar and syntax) is abysmal. In its current state, it's doubtful the article can simply be edited to comply with WP:BLP (especially with editors like Billboarder22 coming out of the woodwork to promote particular viewpoints). On the whole, not worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia.    DK   qwerty    09:23, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - No mention of King as an individual anywhere on Google, and the links to the album that I've found cannot be used as references - definitely not notable enough for inclusion - to add insult to injury, article creator has been indeffed. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 15:29, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.