Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylvain Dubord


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Deleted -- ( &#x263A; drini &#x266B; | &#x260E; ) 02:28, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Sylvain Dubord
This artist gets seven primary results from Google, which doesn't seem to make him sufficiently notable. Delete. The article has POV problems which should be addressed if it is kept.-gadfium 03:14, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Maybe not notable, but great artwork! Take a look at the gallery. &spades; DanMS 04:47, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -Nameneko 06:06, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete with regret, because the guy can draw. But I can't find any evidence of notability.  Crypticfirefly 06:23, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep just leave it be. He'll be notable enough. (preceding unsigned comment by )
 * When he is, he can have a Wikipedia article. In the meantime, however, Wikipedia is here to talk about things and people that are already notable, not to help promote things and people that want to become notable. Delete. Bearcat 16:53, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of verifiability. Nice art, tho. Friday (talk) 14:44, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: The number of great artists is far higher than the number of notable, referred-to artists. This is an encyclopedia: it seeks to explain things referred to by other things, not to make the fame or recognize the worth or reward the virtue of anyone. Geogre 15:57, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity page. -- Corvus 16:42, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless can reference at least one exhibit in one gallery or major competition. Is that too much to ask for? Owen&times; &#9742;  17:56, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * --not major, but he's been a hit at the Montreal Erotic Art Expo 2003 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.82.224.45 (talk • contribs) 14:23, 1 October 2005 UTC
 * Delete nn/vanity -- red stucco 08:25, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ryan Norton T 23:23, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.