Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylvain Perdigon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Sylvain Perdigon

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and can not see any of the criteria of WP:NSCHOLAR they meet.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, an Assistant Professor with an h-index of 4, nothing to indicate passing WP:PROF yet. Nsk92 (talk) 18:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Pretty clearly not notable, article reads like a prose version of his CV.8JoelleJay (talk) 20:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete very flowery language for not much substance. Oaktree b (talk) 21:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Looking at https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=uE0LPfkAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao is fairly low numbers, and no other evidence of passing WP:NPROF at the moment. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete As per all above. Setreis (talk) 17:45, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable. Fail to meet WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOLAR --Kemalcan (talk) 10:29, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.