Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylvia Boots


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 05:29, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Sylvia Boots

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I have nominated this article based on my reasoning at Articles for deletion/Kimberly Devine. Not a notable enough person for a Wikipedia article, and at worst, self-promotional. MartinShadow (talk) 04:13, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions.   --  StarM  04:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions.   --  StarM  04:21, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 04:23, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 07:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. But, in fairness, I should note that there's another story for this living person.  It's entirely derogatory.  I deleted all reference to it because its sourcing wasn't even remotely proper.  Please read the recent edit history of this article before deciding on this AfD.  The way the page looks now, I can see why the nominator characterized it as possibly self-promotional.  But looking at the stuff I've edited out will probably lead to a different conclusion. Far from being self-promotional, it was an unsourced attack page. David in DC (talk) 15:22, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Indeed... the problem with what you pulled out is that there isn't a reliable source immediately locatable for the conviction. I can find blog and forum postings detailing what her real name is and the details behind the conviction, but no reliable source for the name. I can also find a reliable source (, which is ultimately tracks back to "The california lawyer directory") that spells out the results of an appeal to that original sentence. So given the one key missing link in the chain of information (reliable sourcing of the name) we can't use it. Tabercil (talk) 21:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I declined the speedy request on the grounds that what sourcing there was indicated that it wasn't just an attack page, but I was unable to find mainstream sourcing that would lead me to !vote the other way.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:37, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet WP:PORNBIO]. 16:40, 24 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatarian (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.