Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylvie Silva (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 06:55, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Sylvie Silva
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparently same page as one deleted, as evinced by Articles for deletion/Sylvie Silva being older than this page. Please salt. From AnUnnamedUser (open talk page) 03:19, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Only known for one event, sources lacking and didn't win the event yet (WP:CRYSTALBALL. IlluminatingTrooper (talk) 03:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Would also delete Draft:Sylvie Silva and its talk page; would recommend salting it too. From AnUnnamedUser (open talk page)  03:45, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: We have four sources now, the article is only short. Triila73 (talk) 04:07, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * You don't seem to understand the nomination. From AnUnnamedUser (open talk page)  04:12, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Administrator comment: This article was deleted on 17 September in accordance with WP:G5 because it was created by a banned user. Then on 21 September it was re-created by . All of the history has been restored so anyone can examine it. The new version from 9/21 is dissimilar to the deleted version from 9/6 and in spite of a sockpuppet of the banned user returning to edit the new version, it remains substantially different. Therefore, the rationale of this nomination isn't valid. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:30, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Slight correction to your comment. The current article at this AfD [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=create&user=Unitech2019&page=Sylvie+Silva was created] by on 9/22 who is now blocked as a sockpuppet. The version created by  on 9/21 [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=&user=CASSIOPEIA&page=Sylvie+Silva&wpdate=&tagfilter= was moved to draft] at the time.  It was later merged into this. So technically the article (before merge) qualified for G5 as a creation by , the problem was that another article (created by ) was merged into it; I am not sure why. And that's the reason the article "remains substantially different" from the first deleted version. The better thing would have been to delete the version by  when he was blocked and leave the draft version by  as it was, since they are different users and on different standings. – Ammarpad (talk) 05:58, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable beauty queen.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:57, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:05, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:05, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:05, 22 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete G5 - not only are both the creators sockpuppets of blocked users, so are most of the contributors,, , , , , . -- Cabayi (talk) 07:07, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete and Salt Per G5; Salt due to extensive socking. Kb03 (talk) 13:51, 23 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.