Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Symbiocity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Symbiocity

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I could not find significant coverage in reliable sources to indicate notability of this, um, Swedish trademark. Reads like a press release or something similar, not sure if it merits and article. — m o n o  (how's my driving?) 03:22, 10 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:11, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  --  N / A  0  04:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  --  N / A  0  04:25, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Although not widely used, it does appear in reliable third party publications using its sustainable growth meaning. A few are here:Eudemis (talk) 04:43, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 05:48, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

Delete - As is, I'd go for deleting it, but if you were to make it not promotional and add a few more sources, it'd be perfectly fine. :) ~ Qwerp Qwertus ·  Contact Me  · 06:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.