Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Symbollocks

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 12:48, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Symbollocks
Neologism, fails Google tests. sjorford &rarr;&bull;&larr; 00:10, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable neologism. Megan1967 00:54, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy I believe this is "Mr. Suffix" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism_in_progress#Mr._Suffix_.28Neologisms.29 and even if not it's damn close to patent nonsense. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 01:06, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems like neologism or a very obscure term; either way... --Sn0wflake 01:24, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. - Jpo 02:49, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism, until there is some evidence to the contrary. Zzyzx11 06:07, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.