Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Symphonic Winds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. This is a Secret account 18:23, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Symphonic Winds

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Page has been tagged as unreferenced since June of this year. I've just done some googling, and found one item that might just qualify as an independent source, and that was so sketchy as to be meaningless. There are several things that could be construed as claims to notability, but without sources they're worthless. Please also see recent deletion discussion for another group associated with St. Peters Lutheran College, Articles for deletion/St Peters Orchestra. Finally, even if this article survives AFD, it should be moved to St Peters Symphonic Winds since Symphonic Winds is a synonym for Concert band and so should really re-direct there. David Underdown 10:37, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as nominator. David Underdown 10:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Here is the link. http://www.stpeters.qld.edu.au/cms/stpeters/cocurricular/music/Ensembles.html I don't know if it is notable however, as I can't find any sources saying who they played with etc. If it is found to be notable, then it needs to be rewritten scope_creep 15:35, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, that's not an independent source as it is from the school itself. Notability requires independent sources. David Underdown 15:46, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Qst  17:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Article is not sourced and fails WP:MUSIC criteria for inclusion. TonyBallioni 12:54, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per TonyBallioni. The ensemble's entry in the College's article should be sufficient. Smalljim 15:25, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.