Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Symply Tacha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Symply Tacha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:ENTERTAINER. A Google search of her doesn't show her being discussed in reliable secondary sources. She is only known for her participation in Big Brother Nigeria, a single event. She did not even win said event. Let me also add that the article's creator created a draft article about the subject, which was declined on 20 November 2019.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 14:30, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 14:30, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 14:30, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 14:30, 1 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Insufficientat the moment. Fails WP:BIO and WP:ENTERTAINER.  scope_creep Talk  12:00, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Accomplishments not notable. David notMD (talk) 20:41, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Echoing Versace1608 Subject of article clearly fails WP:GNG & even WP:BIO Celestina007 (talk) 01:41 03 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - I see that the article was speedily deleted under G7 but has now been replaced by an editor moving a declined AFC draft to mainspace (without tidying up the AFC submission template). The new version doesn't link to this AFD nomination. A mess which needs tidying up. --David Biddulph (talk) 08:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I have restored the AfD tag to the article. Perhaps an administrator with access to the deleted history of the page could let us know whether the reinstated draft is similar the article which was deleted under G7 as that could affect this AfD discussion. Regarding the draft template on the page, we can either leave it as a draft and move the article back into draftspace, or remove the AfC template and leave the article in the mainspace for the duration of this AfD. Since this was originally an article in the mainspace which was being considered for deletion, I prefer the second option - let's let the AfD continue as it would have done before the author intervened. Also, the draft was declined for not being notable enough, which is precisely the issue being discussed in this AfD; I think a consensus at AfD supersedes the opinion of one AfC reviewer so we should let it run its course. If no one objects, I will do that later today. WJ94 (talk) 11:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I have removed the AfC template. WJ94 (talk) 17:35, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment I have checked the deleted version as it was just before deletion. It uses the exact same cited sources in the exact same order. I don't think it is byte-for-byte identical, but there is not significant difference between them that i notived. If the first had been deleted by AfD, the second would be a valid G4 speedy in my view. I choose to assume good faith that this was not a knowing attempt to circumvent the deletion process, but it might as well have been. Predictably, it didn't work ., the creator of the version now in mainspace, made the overwhelming majority of the edits to the deleted version, and tagged it for deletion under G7, user request. But really, this version should be kept or deleted on its own merits, without regard to the actions of th4e creator or other editors. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Article creator User:AndrewNatty now indef blocked as sockpuppet. David notMD (talk) 21:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as not meeting notability for biographies or general notability. Given the comments about the creator being a sock and similarities to prior deleted version, delete and salt.  Ravensfire  (talk) 16:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.