Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syncmag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 11:33, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Syncmag

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a magazine which just asserts the publication's existence and fails to actually make any claim of notability that would get it past WP:NMEDIA — and there's no evidence of passing WP:GNG here, either, as two of the four sources are primary ones and the other two are non-notable blogs reposting the same blurby press release (i.e. cursory, non-substantive coverage) about a personality who made it onto the cover. The magazine certainly might be a legitimate topic for a substantive and properly sourced article, but that's not what this article is. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 22:13, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk to me  22:19, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 05:11, 28 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete The article has several references, but none of them are substantial, as pointed out by the nom. --Randykitty (talk) 06:45, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete The relevant WikiProject_Magazines criterion would be "5. are significant publications in ethnic and other non-trivial niche markets", but it doesn't establish that, and even if it did I don't know if one ethnic community in one area of Canada would be enough. – Margin1522 (talk) 11:45, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.