Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syneos Health


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Editors can't agree and there is no appetite for further discussion. (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 07:04, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Syneos Health

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Blatant advertisement the point of which is to abuse WP for visibility. Sources are all press releases/churnalism/SPS. SPeedy was declined with a basis that "long-term article & not irredeemably promotional; suggest AfD". All I can say is yes - barrels of industrial waste do get dumped into national forests and not found until years later. Jytdog (talk) 03:57, 19 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Jytdog (talk) 03:58, 19 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep a short factul listing. This is not some corner store looking for a free listing, it's a 14,000 employee company. Reality is company info is made available via press releases and websites. It is also NASDAQ WP:LISTED which needs to be in the article text (I added it). Here is a round up of third party coverage
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 04:53, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 04:53, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * A atock watchers blog? really? And WP is not a directory - if there are not sufficient independent sources with signficant discussion so that we we can write an encyclopedia article, the page should not exist. Surprising !vote to me. Jytdog (talk) 04:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The stockwatcher blog shows that the listed company has analysts following it which means there is definately regular independent coverage available. Call me old fashioned but I believe large companies that employ people and make stuff and that people's pensions are invested in are a lot more notable than housewives who were once pageant queens who won a contest of looks and east german handball players who played in the Olympics once but we can barely source their names. I'm as anti spam as anyone but this is a short factual listing with sources. Sure it can be improved, but the company is clearly notable. Legacypac (talk) 05:01, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Call me old fashioned but industrial pollution is not any less pollution based on who dumps it into WP - there is no difference in the abuse if it is a beauty pageant queen or a company that employs lots of people or Mother Teresa. We are not a vehicle for giving more visibility to anything or anyone and we are not a directory. There is nothing to learn from in this page.  Wikidata is fine with directory entries; they want to include every factoid in the world over there. That is not what we do here. Jytdog (talk) 20:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:23, 26 March 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep This appears to be a serious hospital in Massachusetts, and there seems to be no reason for deletion of this page. UserTalk: DanTheMagicalMan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danthemagicalman (talk • contribs) 19:47, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * That !vote has nothing to do with NCORP or N generally. Jytdog (talk) 20:11, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 17:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.