Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synergium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 15:18, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Synergium

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Fails WP:CORP. References given demonstrate its existence and one appears to be a press release. Nothing of any weight or notability. Reads like an advertisement  Velella  Velella Talk 09:36, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:41, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 16:39, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete per nom. SMC (talk) 16:48, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of in-depth, reliable coverage. Sources provided are mostly trivial and prove only the existence of the subject. Bulk of the article is just a vague description of the translation process. Angrysockhop  ( talk to me ) 20:09, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - found coverage from national dailies in Lithuania and Latvia in GNews archive (which isn't very easy to get at these days, unfortunately). National news coverage plus recent recognition in Deloitte Fast 500 qualifies them per WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Altered Walter (talk) 12:28, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: per Altered Walter. הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 19:20, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:20, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. did a great job looking for sources, but two of the new sources read like press releases after translation, and the third just indicates they entered themselves in a contest for an award.  Winning the award would help convey notability, entering does not. Also, not sure what Altered Walter is referring to by "recent recgnition" in the Fast 500, as they were not listed in the EMEA 2012 Fast 500 at all, and they were not in the top 10 any of the prior 5 years either. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 07:34, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.