Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synergy Marine Group (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as there is no indication anyone wants to work on this in draft space, so without that it's just kicking it six months down the road. If someone wants it, no need to go through Refund, happy to provide. Star  Mississippi  01:53, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Synergy Marine Group
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Citations are not good. Mostly some press releases and routine coverage. TheMermaidWomen (talk) 14:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. TheMermaidWomen (talk) 14:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment The company seems to be pretty large, I would expect a company of this size to pass WP:NCORP. Maybe there just aren't many articles in english? The article as it stands definitely requires improvement however. GoldMiner24 Talk 16:43, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:45, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify: GoldMiner24 is right. This company appears to have indication of notability. Why cant we move this to draft space instead of deleting? Interested editors can work on this, find citations to establish notability.Akevsharma (talk) 06:15, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Move to draft: There seems to be a room for improvement. 2405:204:28E:3E17:34BF:13FF:FEE9:2065 (talk) 10:54, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 * We typically don't draftify 9 year old articles although a AFD closer could still choose that option. Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Also thought I'd mention that the nominator has been blocked for sockpuppetry. Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
 * It's especially confusing since the nominator's main account suggested keeping this article in the last AfD. But now that it's here, it seems pretty clear that the subject doesn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH.  FalconK (talk) 23:21, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Size or assets are specifically not criteria in WP:NCORP.  Foreign language articles would be acceptable, but would need to be found and might not exist.  As it stands, this page exists for the company's SEO or to improve their sales or something.  FalconK (talk) 23:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.