Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synergy Pharmaceuticals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 08:25, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Synergy Pharmaceuticals

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails GNG. Sources appear to be blogs or PR. The medial studies don't seem to mention the product at all, hence claims made about the product cannot be substantiated. Likely promo or undisclosed paid editing. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:PROMO, WP:GNG, WP:CORP, The "London Post" is not a real newspaper but instead some spammy self-published source. FOARP (talk) 12:17, 19 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Hey there, Just took your points seriously and thanks for raising the questions. I have edited more Reliable Sources in the Article and will be adding more. And then comes to the other company with the same name yes there's another company to in New york which is also in the Medical research field but the topic on which i wrote is an Company/Organisation which was first to find the cure of a dangerous disease near about on 800,000+ people was Herpes. The company is Listed in many news sources and journals. I think now the article is ready to be keapt as an alteast a stub. I have did many changes around the articles also request other editors to help this articles if they can. Rajusinghchan (talk) 15:56, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * favour I think this article should be reviewed carefully as it is written in good faith. Company is doing good work by helping million of people. ☆★  Sunil Butolia   ( ✉✉ ) 16:13, 19 December 2019 (UTC)sunilbutolia
 * I don't want to bust WP:AGF, but it's, um, interesting that the above two editors are suddenly interested in this topic. Anyway, the new sources added are also not reliable sources - California Herald is another Spammy health-PR site. Another is a self-published debunking site that interestingly links to an FDA ruling saying that the company's products are junk.FOARP (talk) 16:50, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * PS - Just in case this gets missed, in one of the supporting links, a self-published article has the FDA literally saying that this is a garbage company peddling quack medicine. This article is not only not notable, but actually harmfully misleading (it tells people that there is a herbal "antidote" for Herpes) and should be deleted. FOARP (talk) 08:36, 23 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. There is a source from the Orlando Sentinel, but it is from a contributing reader; in other words not reliable. -- Whpq (talk) 13:40, 20 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.