Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synesthesia (Buck 65)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. --Ryan Delaney talk 23:10, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Synesthesia (Buck 65)
Sounds like a review and even says so on the discussion page. It says it's supposed to be edited soon, but the last (and only) edit was about a week and a half into August. Nameneko 06:01, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and rewrite Albums have their own page. --TM (talk) 06:14, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. True, albums have their place in Wikipedia, but there's no need to retain this review. - Mgm|(talk) 11:05, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I've rewritten it to conform to Wikistandards for album pages. --TM (talk) 18:16, 26 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep, contains usable facts. Kappa 12:44, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep following TM's rewrite. Cnwb 04:49, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * keep please this is rewritten now so we cannot erase this Yuckfoo 21:56, 29 September 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.