Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synnack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 22:30, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Synnack

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Spam. Not notable. Fruktoĝardeno (talk) 17:33, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:38, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Interesting stuff, but fails WP:BAND and WP:GNG. Also appears to be a copyvio of .  I've tagged the article for speedy deletion because of the copyvio.  mono Chrome and cut.rate.box appear to be similar articles created by the same COI editor, and may also need to be nominated.  Snotty Wong   prattle 19:33, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I've removed all the data that appears to be a copyvio (and the CSD tag). There is quite a bit of article left.  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:59, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I've removed more material that is a copyvio (see edit summaries). The only thing left is the lead.  Snotty Wong   verbalize 23:08, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete closest thing to notability here is having a member, Sand, being a member of to blue linked (for now, won't last long) bands but that is not good enough for wp:music. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:32, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.