Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synovel CollabSuite


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Gashok's changes do not remedy the main reason for deletion, lack of notability.  Sandstein  07:30, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Synovel CollabSuite

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Unencyclopedic techno-babble, reads like an advert. No hits in reputable book sources. Web hits mainly mirrors of wikipedia, no coverage in reliable publications.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:50, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 24 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, no significant coverage, this is basically spam. --Nuujinn (talk) 13:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. -- Whpq (talk) 15:33, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, spam: It also provides some innovative features that improve productivity of the user. Some of them include a dashboard that pulls information from various applications and presents a summary and the feature of detecting a calendar event (meetings, appointments etc.) from email text.... - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 01:53, 27 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The advertisement like content has been deleted from the article. I suggest that this article be marked for improvement than deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gashok (talk • contribs) 18:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I will be adding more encyclopedic links and references. This software is listed in very famous software portals like http://freshmeat.net/ from where the features are verified and summarized. So the claim about 'no coverage in reliable publications' is not true. Can you please elaborate on 'Web hits mainly mirrors of wikipedia' —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gashok (talk • contribs) 17:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment, Freshmeat is not a reliable source, it's just a venue for distributing software, please see WP:RS for policy as to what kind of sources count. Many web sites mirror wikipedia content, and since wikipedia is not itself considered a reliable source, web sites that mirror wikipedia content are also considered unreliable. The kind of source that is ideal is a in depth review of the software in a magazine or newspaper, or a book with significant coverage. Hope that helps clarify the issue. --Nuujinn (talk) 17:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Added references and removed advertising like content. Gashok (talk) 14:26, 29 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, not yet notable. Yworo (talk) 22:35, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Made some major content changes, added references and removed advertisement like content. Gashok (talk) 10:54, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.