Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syren Sexton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 03:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Syren Sexton

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:PORNBIO, no indication the subject can satisfy the GNG or any other specialized guideline. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits. Claimed awards, supposedly representing website polls, are given by product suppliers to their own performers, fail the "well-known"/"significant" standard, and therefore do not demonstrate notability. PROD removed by IP sock of indef-blocked user. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC) Delete - As per nomination. --Antwerpen Synagoge (talk) 19:38, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  --  JN  466  23:02, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  --  JN  466  23:02, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Ms Sexton, for better or worse, is a performer on the rise and clearly notable in her field. Profile on the up, new and up-to-date personal website, working with major pornographers in UK and US, recent dps feature in "Nuts" magazine. Removal of this wiki seems pointless, as it is sure (though not by me) to be recreated. For the record, I'm not a sock of a banned user and I removed the PROD which self-identifed (here) as being in 'bad faith' by the proposer, HW. Not sure why HW thinks I am a sock, nor much do I care, but he/she is barking up the wrong tree here. Irrelevant of course, this is an incoherent AfD that reeks of personal distaste. --82.41.20.82 (talk) 20:54, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The reference cited by 82.41.20.82 does not show that the person who placed the PROD tag admitted to doing so in bad faith. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * It's entitled 'bad faith prod removals' and concerns the removal of a bad faith prod. This is straightforward. --82.41.20.82 (talk) 11:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, I think he was accusing someone else of removing the PROD tag in bad faith. See Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion on the same page for comparison. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked Sockpuppet. See Sockpuppet investigations/אֶפְרָתָה. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  19:42, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like it fails WP:PORNBIO --Guerillero &#124; My Talk   03:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - PORNBIO fail. "SHAFTA" is not a notable award. Tarc (talk) 16:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing a claim that 'SHAFTA' is a notable award. --82.41.20.82 (talk) 00:20, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.