Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/System76


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR Mark Arsten (talk) 15:20, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

System76

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ORG. The only reliable coverage that is not from the company itself appears to be lists that merely include System76 among other Linux OEMs or otherwise trivial coverage (see for example, , and ). This is not sufficient for notability. RJaguar3 &#124; u  &#124;  t  05:02, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep well-known Linux PC OEM with plenty of coverage available. You might describe any of the sources as "trivial". What is your criteria for dismissing references? --JBrown23 (talk) 10:01, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The first two links are cited to omgubuntu.co.uk, which does not appear to be a reliable source (although, to be fair, I couldn't find any WP:RSN discussion on this site). The second link is borderline trivial coverage as well (a brief description of a System76 computer in a list of Linux computers).  The third source (which I pulled up from a Google news search) is unquestionably reliable, but the coverage of System76 is clearly trivial ("Over the course of 2012, in fact, we saw machines from not just specialty makers ZaReason, System76, and ThinkPenguin offer this option, but also Asus, Dell, and more.").  I couldn't find any reliable sources with nontrivial coverage of the company in my research, but I would certainly appreciate being pointed to any that do exist.  RJaguar3 &#124;  u  &#124;  t  15:02, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have added what seems to be non-trivial coverage from some well known publishers, including Engadget, PCWorld, and ZDNet. I hope this helps with this effort.  Benjaminoakes (talk) 22:54, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 20:51, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Automatic Strikeout  ( T  •  C ) 00:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:09, 4 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.