Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/System requirements (Spacecraft system)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep as notable, well-sourced article, per WP:HEY. Bearian 17:57, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

System requirements (Spacecraft system)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable sub branch of System requirements. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:13, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * This article just started after some discussion at the system requirements article. Can we start an article like this and try to improve it. That spacecraft is a not-notable branch is a very questionable argument. - Mdd (talk) 14:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The problem at the system requirements is that that article is primairy about software systems engineering requirements and we want to have a more general systems engineering requirements article, where we can fit the text of the System requirements (Spacecraft system). I do agree something has to be done here. - Mdd (talk) 17:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The situation seems a bit more complicated. Lot's of websites about systems requirements are about computer systems or software systems. But if you look for "System requirements" & "space systems" you still find a 45.000 Google rate. This should be enough to create a notable article. But this will take some time. - Mdd (talk) 20:13, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Now we improved this article, and it still needs a lot of work. But the article is wikified and the notability is established. So I hope you could let us continue developing this article. - Mdd (talk) 22:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment as nominator, seems to indicate sufficient notability. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:10, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.